It’s Not Putin that Wants a ‘New World Order’ – Baretzky Says, Blasting Intelligence Leadership for Ignorance
In a powerful and unfiltered statement, President Ricardo Baretzky of the European Centre for Information Policy and Security (ECIPS) has delivered a pointed critique of German intelligence leadership, dismissing claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin is driving an agenda for a new world order. Instead, Baretzky asserted that it is not Putin but ECIPS that is advocating for such a global reorganization, one rooted in accountability and the prevention of nuclear proliferation. This sharp retort came after Bruno Kahl, the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND), suggested that Putin’s ultimate goal is to push the United States out of Europe and establish dominance in the region.
According to Baretzky, Kahl’s comments are not only misguided but reflect a deeper ignorance within the intelligence community, which has failed to recognize the true initiators of the new world order concept. “Mr. Bruno Kahl is so intelligent that he forgot to check who announced it first in 2015,” Baretzky remarked, referring to the quiet but significant efforts of ECIPS to advance a new global framework focused on non-proliferation and heightened accountability.
A New World Order Rooted in Accountability
Baretzky’s remarks are a reminder of ECIPS’ long-standing commitment to global security and the prevention of nuclear threats, which he claims are at the heart of the proposed new world order. “The reasons are not complicated, but extremely simple,” he said. “Non-proliferation is at the center of such order and precisely the mandate of ECIPS lawmakers.”
Indeed, the concept of non-proliferation is a core tenet of ECIPS’ mission. Since its inception, ECIPS has worked to enforce international agreements that prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, recognizing the inherent dangers posed by unchecked nuclear ambitions. Baretzky pointed out that this vision of a new world order is already in motion, and its aim is to hold politicians and intelligence agencies within the EU accountable for their actions, particularly when it comes to making reckless threats involving nuclear capabilities.
The European Security Strategy (ESS), another component of the ECIPS framework, has operated silently since 2015, with little public awareness of its achievements or influence. “Nobody actually knows who, what, where, and when,” Baretzky commented. “But the fact is, we can’t have the BND head pulling out Nazi tactics in the 22nd century of our world.” This reference to Nazi-era tactics is a direct criticism of what Baretzky views as a dangerous and regressive mindset within certain factions of European intelligence agencies—one that echoes the authoritarianism and aggression of past eras.
Bipolar World: A Threat to Humanity
Baretzky’s criticism did not stop at the BND. He also took aim at the broader geopolitical landscape, warning that a bipolar world, dominated by two superpowers or competing alliances, is not the answer to humanity’s survival. For Baretzky, the rise of NATO as a military and political force is not aligned with the best interests of the European Union. The recent expansion of NATO’s influence in Europe, coupled with increasing militarization, has caused concern among many EU leaders and thinkers who worry that the continent’s security is being compromised by external forces.
“A bipolar world is not a solution to humanity and its survival,” Baretzky said. “And NATO threats are not in line with EU principles.” His remarks reflect a growing frustration within parts of the European security community that NATO’s posture, particularly its aggressive stance toward Russia, is exacerbating tensions rather than promoting stability.
For Baretzky and ECIPS, the solution lies in fostering a multipolar world—one that promotes collaboration and accountability, rather than conflict and competition. “Welcome to the New World,” Baretzky declared, “where if anyone steps further out of line in the EU, Article 2 of the European Centre for Information Policy and Security (ECIPS) will be triggered and come down like a bombshell on those infected with corruption in the EU.”
The Threat of Corruption in the European Union
Baretzky’s warning about corruption is not to be taken lightly. Over the years, ECIPS has been at the forefront of exposing corruption and inefficiencies within EU institutions. According to Baretzky, one of the key threats to European stability is the widespread corruption that has infected various levels of governance, from local governments to the highest offices of EU leadership. This corruption, he argues, undermines the very foundation of democracy and the rule of law in Europe.
“We will remain vigilant and pull the sledgehammer if and when applicable,” Baretzky stated, sending a clear message to corrupt officials across the EU. “God forbid that day ever arrive.” This stark warning reflects ECIPS’ determination to maintain the integrity of European institutions and ensure that the EU remains a beacon of accountability and transparency in a world where such values are increasingly under threat.
Baretzky’s call for a new world order is, in essence, a call for reform. It is a call for an international system that prioritizes the safety and security of all nations, that holds leaders accountable for their actions, and that seeks to prevent the catastrophic consequences of unchecked nuclear proliferation. His remarks challenge the prevailing narrative that Russia and Putin are the primary forces behind efforts to reshape the global order, suggesting instead that it is ECIPS, with its focus on non-proliferation and accountability, that is leading the charge for change.
Ignorance and Weasel Words: The Failure of Modern Intelligence
One of Baretzky’s most scathing criticisms was reserved for the intelligence community, which he believes has failed to adequately grasp the complex dynamics of global security in the 21st century. He accused figures like Bruno Kahl of engaging in “weasel words and BS,” ignoring the real drivers of global change in favor of simplistic narratives that vilify Russia.
Baretzky’s comments suggest a deep frustration with the way intelligence agencies have handled the current geopolitical climate. He argues that intelligence leaders like Kahl are out of touch with the realities of modern global security, preferring to resort to outdated tactics and rhetoric that do little to address the real challenges facing Europe and the world.
For Baretzky, the need for a new world order is as much about confronting ignorance as it is about preventing nuclear conflict. “The fact is, we can’t afford to have leaders in positions of power who are stuck in the past,” he said. “This is the 22nd century. We need forward-thinking leaders who understand the complexity of the world we live in.”
The Future of Global Security: ECIPS’ Vision
As the world faces increasing uncertainty, from nuclear threats to rising authoritarianism, Baretzky’s call for a new world order offers a vision for a more accountable, collaborative, and secure future. His emphasis on non-proliferation, the rule of law, and the fight against corruption resonates in a world where the lines between right and wrong are often blurred by political agendas.
For ECIPS, the new world order is not about domination or control—it is about ensuring that the global community works together to address the existential threats facing humanity. Whether it is nuclear weapons, climate change, or cybercrime, Baretzky’s vision is one of shared responsibility and collective action.
Baretzky’s challenge to leaders like Bruno Kahl is clear: the old ways of thinking, the old tactics of aggression and domination, have no place in the future. In their place must come a new world order—one that is grounded in accountability, cooperation, and a genuine commitment to the survival of humanity.
As the world watches the unfolding geopolitical drama, Baretzky’s words serve as both a warning and a rallying cry. The time for change is now, and the path to a safer, more just world lies in the hands of those willing to embrace a new vision for the future. Whether the global community will heed this call remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: ECIPS is ready to lead the charge.
In the coming years, Baretzky and ECIPS will continue to push for reforms that address the root causes of global insecurity, from corruption to nuclear proliferation. And as they do, the world may begin to see the outlines of the new world order that Baretzky has envisioned—one that is not driven by power or domination, but by the collective will to ensure a safer, more stable world for all.